Ex-Eversheds staffer banned after invoicing for pro bono work

A former Eversheds Sutherland project coordinator has been banned from working in law after creating nearly £136,000 in invoices for a pro bono matter he brought to the firm.
The SRA found his actions dishonest, despite no personal financial gain, and imposed a Section 43 Order preventing him from working without regulator permission.
A former project coordinator at Eversheds Sutherland has been banned from working in law after creating invoices for work the firm had agreed to carry out on a pro bono basis, according to a decision published by the SRA.
Thomas Elliott, who was not legally qualified, admitted to generating two invoices for a disciplinary case involving a footballer he had personally referred to the firm while serving as club secretary at a local sports club.
The firm had agreed to represent the player for free in proceedings brought by a local sports association. Despite this, Elliott issued an invoice on 2 August 2023 seeking payment of £39,963, and a second invoice two days later claiming £95,912, according to the SRA.
Internal investigation
When interviewed by the firm, Elliott initially denied creating the second invoice. He later admitted his account was false and that he had produced the invoice using internal information. He resigned on 30 October 2023, following the investigation.
In mitigation, Elliott told the SRA his actions were "hot-headed" and driven by what he saw as an injustice against the player. The SRA said he was not motivated by financial gain and had hoped to help the firm recover some costs.
SRA decision
Despite acknowledging that Elliott showed remorse and cooperated fully with the investigation, the SRA said his behaviour was dishonest and made him "undesirable to be involved in legal practice."
His actions, the regulator said, showed a willingness to misuse confidential information and mislead his employer to pursue a personal agenda.
Under a Section 43 Order, Elliott is barred from working in any legal role without the SRA’s permission. He agreed to the order, its publication, and to pay £300 in costs.
Join 10,000+ City lawyers who start their day with our newsletter.
The essential read for commercially aware lawyers.